How to Lose 1. 0 Pounds in 3 Days » i. Fitand. Healthy. com. Could you please help me lose 1. I’m getting married this week . Thanks, Sherri.- – via Ask Questions. I would love to help you, and I wish I could tell you how to lose 1. To put things into perspective, on average, people can expect to lose 1- 2 pounds a week- to lose 1. However, getting married is a very special occasion. So I will give you some tips for a quick weight loss. Please keep in mind, I cannot tell you if you will lose 1. I do not even know if you will lose any weight at all in 3 days. For the next 3 days, do not eat any sugar. Eliminate all traditional sources of carbohydrates. Do no eat any pasta, bread of any kind, cookies, cakes, ice cream, soda, donuts, bagels, morning cereal, oatmeal, rice, French fries, pizza, candies, etc. Get all your carbohydrates exclusively from vegetables. For example, broccoli, green leafy vegetables, bell peppers, cabbage, Brussels sprouts, asparagus, avocado, cauliflower and others are all good choices. Do not forget to eat breakfast. If you eat big meals, 2- 3 times a day, divide the amount of food you usually eat into 4 to 5 meals. In other words, eat smaller meals more often. Drink plenty of water and eat protein with every meal – chicken, lean cuts of beef, shrimp, lean pork, lamb, egg whites, as well as eggs and any fish. You also need to exercise. Since you are short on time, the easiest way to get some cardio done is walking, rollerblading, bicycling, swimming, or any activity that will get you moving more than you usually do. If you are interested in a permanent weight loss, your best bet is a balanced diet and exercise. Finding a diet and an exercise program with which you feel comfortable, will aid in your adherence to meeting your weight- loss goal. Predicting Obesity in Young Adulthood from Childhood and Parental Obesity. Whitaker, M.D., M.P.H., Jeffrey A. Wright, M.D., Margaret S. Read reviews and buy SlimFast Powder Tin Banana 438g at Superdrug. Free standard delivery for Health and Beautycard members. Hey Wellness Mama, I love reading everything you wright about. Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us.
There are many good diets out there, but if you do not know where to start, I would recommend this program or Burn The Fat, Feed The Muscle. These plans are not just some fad diets. They are, however, great programs. Because they are easy to understand, anyone can follow them, and they teach excellent eating and exercise habits, which you will be able to use at your own pace. You should consult with your doctor before making any drastic changes to your diet or starting an exercise program. Posted October 1. Ask Questions, Diet & Weight Loss, How To .. Gun Review: Smith & Wesson Model 6. Magnum (Take Two)When I wrapped my hands around the diminutive Smith & Wesson Model 6. Honey, I Shrunk The 6. As I turned it over in my hands, I started to. But trust me: it’s a real gun. In fact it’s a fire- breathing fistful of ballistic fury, and you’ll use two fists if you know what’s good for you . Unlike the Model 3. Chief’s Special or the hammerless Model 6. Model 6. 0 is not designed for deep concealment. It features precision adjustable sights. It feels in hand like a miniature Model 6. This photo isn’t staged or Photoshopped; it’s an unintentional double- exposure from an i. Phone camera (don’t ask me how). It shows the sharp, quick recoil that this gun delivers with . Magnum defensive ammunition. Ergonomics. With the exception of the snappy recoil, the Model 6. I’ve always been a fan of 3- inch revolver barrels; I’ve found them to provide a decent compromise between accuracy, ballistics, concealability and recoil. The Model 6. 0’s 3- inch tube only confirms my opinion. The double- action trigger is heavy but smooth; I’d estimate it at around twelve pounds. This sounds awfully heavy, but the smoothness makes it feel much lighter, and it delivered some very accurate double- action groups. This double- action group shows what this gun will do at seven yards when you have the luxury of taking your time between shots. When you’re in a hurry, groups open up fast; but I’m skipping ahead to the . While useless for defensive use, such a fine S/A trigger is ideal for recreational shooting and could make this pistol a viable option for small game hunting. The narrow, low- profile hammer is adequately checkered for secure cocking, but S& W lightly de- horns the edges and rounds off the rear so it’s not egregiously snaggy on clothing. I couldn’t fully evaluate the carry ergonomics of this gun, because I lacked a proper holster to carry it in. If you’ve got a yen for the Model 6. It will fit any J- frame holster with an open muzzle, although you’ll want to be sure that the Model 6. Sights. The fully- adjustable target sights are very precise–a real bonus on a surprisingly accurate gun like this–but they’re small and difficult to acquire in many lighting conditions. If this were my gun I’d dab them with fluorescent Sight Bright for a quick and cheap fix. If I were ordering a new Model 6. I’d consider the factory Crimson Trace laser grips or fiber- optic front sights. Either (or both) would be excellent choices, although the Crimson Trace grips are pricey. Even these dark target sights are worlds better than the godawful . The all- steel Model 6. I wouldn’t complain; this is pretty svelte for a pistol in this ballistic class, and it doesn’t beat the stuffing out of you the way most 2- inch J- frame . It’s a fullpound lighter than its big brother, the 4- inch Model 6. But if you drop the hammer on full- powered . The hammer is small and narrow and lightly de- horned, but it will still snag in your pocket. Don’t bother to test for yourself: at over seven inches long, the Model 6. It’s more than 1. Even with a shorter 2- inch barrel, the Model 6. So just, don’t, m’kay? It may not be a true pocket gun like a Model 6. CCW pistol. Like all J- frames, the Model 6. IWB or OWB holster, and its slim 5- round cylinder won’t dig painfully into your kidney. The bulky (yet comfortable) grips might be a drawback, depending on your size and build, but you can swap them for shorter, non- rubbery grips cheaply and easily. Any J- frame grips will fit. Accuracy. I already let slip that the Model 6. Offhand two- inch groups at seven yards were no problem in slow D/A shooting, and I’m pretty sure that the slight vertical stringing was caused by the heavy D/A trigger. Single- action accuracy was only a little bit better at close ranges. At 1. 5 yards, our D/A groups opened up to 4- 6 inches, while S/A accuracy stayed sub- minute of beer can. Loaded with mild . It’s a pretty mild shooter with . Specials, but quick double- action firing with defensive . At barroom fighting distances, Wayne and I consistently emptied our meager cylinder- full of Winchester . PDX ammo inside a six- to eight- inch circle, firing as quickly as we could bring the gun back on target. It pounds your hand solidly, in a way that’s less painful than most subcompact 9mms, but produces more muzzle flip and a slower recovery time between shots. With defensive- grade . P ammo, you get less recoil, quicker recovery time, and most, but not all, of the ballistic devastation on target. We shot a handful of standard- pressure . Model 6. 0, and it was a pussycat. Fit And Finish. Like just about all classic Smith & Wesson revolvers, the fit and finish on this Model 6. The only flaws I could notice were very minor ones: a very slight looseness in the grip panels which persisted even when tightened fully down, and a slight mismatch of the external contours of the front face of the cylinder crane and frame. The 3- inch barrel doesn’t carry the same velocity penalty that shorter snubby barrels impose; it behaves more like a full- size 4- inch revolver. I’ll reprint the ballistics numbers from our Performance Center 6. Bullet/Gun. I’m still surprised that this little 3- inch Model 6. Performance Center 6. I wish I could find my feeler gauges to prove it, but these velocity numbers indicate that the Model 6. Unfortunately, the cylinder lockup is not so tight. When you press (not too hard) on the side of the cylinder with the hammer cocked, the crane already shows more flex and wobble than my quarter- century- old Model 6. Durability, or, A Short Lesson In Smith & Wesson . Magnum History. This brings us to one of the unavoidable disadvantages of most small- frame . The classic Model 2. Smith & Wesson’s large N- frame. That first . 3. 57 was much stronger than the cartridge required, and as a result they basically never wore out no matter how much they were shot, or with what ammo. The Model 2. 7 was large and very expensive to manufacture. After 2. 0 years, the immense popularity of the . Smith & Wesson to engineer smaller and less- expensive handguns for it. The medium- sized K frame (used by the classic . Special Model 1. 0) was the basis for the also- classic Model 1. Model 6. 6 revolvers, introduced in 1. They were smaller and lighter than the Model 2. A 4- inch Model 1. The K- frame . 3. The po- po complained that their wheelguns wore out fairly quickly on a diet of heavy . Magnum loads. In particular, the frames would stretch slightly and the cylinder crane (swingarm) would loosen until the cylinder didn’t index properly. For the last half- century, conventional wisdom has held that you shouldn’t shoot too many . Magnums through your K- frame Smith & Wesson. While they don’t mind an occasional box of full- power . For decades Smith & Wesson ignored this problem and told shooters to buy the expensive Model 2. In the meantime, an upstart gunmaker named Bill Ruger started selling millions of ridiculously strong, competitively- priced . Smith & Wesson finally got the message. Smith & Wesson’s answer to the Ruger Security Six was a long time in coming, but it stands as one of the finest revolvers ever made: the medium- large L- frame Model 5. They beefed up the K- frame with an extra quarter- pound of forged steel around the frame, cylinder and crane. The result was a nearly indestructible heavy- duty revolver. It may not be as elegant as a bright- blue Model 1. Magnum over the last quarter- century. If anything, it shoots better now than the day it was born. The Model 6. 0 and other J- frame . The result is a very trim and handsome gun, but it asks a lot from modern metallurgy to expect that a small- frame pistol to tolerate a steady diet of heavy . For all I know other writers may have already put a few thousand rounds of . This would be more . In any case, it’s not valid to judge an entire design based on the unknown use and abuse of a single pistol. Its eventual owner would be well advised to shoot it primarily with . Specials. Full- power . Magnum ammo shoots well (if violently) but it’s just not for everyday use in a gun like this. Like steak dinners and single- malt scotch, they’re best saved for special occasions. I would treat any *new* Model 6. Special revolver, with the added bonus that it can also fire any SAAMI- standard . If you plan to shoot industrial quantities of . Magnums each year, you’ll want a bigger gun. Both it and your wrists will thank you. Reliability. Revolvers are supposed to be 1. Farago experienced a trigger failure with this very pistol a few months ago: His problem was caused by extreme crud buildup in/on the gun after 4. It disappeared after a vigorous cleaning, so I’m thinking that it was caused by a bit of crud jamming up the hammer safety lock mechanism. I’m calling it a maintenance- caused failure, since 4. OTOH, I’ve never experienced a S& W revolver FTF of any kind before (besides a few squib loads). The Model 6. 0 gave me my first. While firing single- action, I cocked the gun and pulled the trigger. Instead of indexing the next chamber and firing a fresh round, the gun had dropped the hammer on the same spent case that had just been fired. Without a gunsmith’s advice, it’s my suspicion that the cylinder crane rattle is starting to cause indexing problems. The Model 6. 0, in its original . Special chambering, is a dependable revolver that has passed the test of time. If this were my revolver I’d schlep it to a gunsmith immediately to have the safety lock mechanism removed and melted into slag. Gunsmiths do it all the time (the removal, not the slagging) and I’d also look into replacing the crane. That’s not a cheap job, unless it’s under warranty. Conclusion. The Model 6. It’s surprisingly accurate and easy to shoot, especially with . Specials. It also gives more experienced handgunners the option of sometimes firing full- power . Magnums. Even the most experienced shooters won’t want to shoot . Hydra- Shocks all day long (and neither will the gun).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |